I received the information copied below from Scott Stein, who is a real estate attorney I know and thought it was worth sharing. All of us have clients or know someone who has been affected by the current real estate crisis, and this is valuable information on changes in the law.
Substantial changes to Arizona’s anti-deficiency law are coming. On July 10, 2009, Arizona Governor Brewer signed SB 1271 into law, which is effective September 30, 2009. This law will have a profound impact on developers and investors of Arizona’s residential real estate market. In the meantime, many questions have arisen about the new law’s meaning.
Current law: Under the current law (A.R.S § 33-814), lenders are prohibited from seeking a deficiency judgment where the trust property is 2.5 acres or less and is used as a single one-family or single two-family dwelling.
New law (effective September 30, 2009): SB 1271 amends A.R.S. § 33-814(G) to require that for a borrower to get the benefit of the anti-deficiency protection, the borrower under the deed of trust must have “utilized” the property for six consecutive months and a certificate of occupancy must have been issued. The law also places the burden of proof on the borrower to prove that the statutory requirements have been satisfied to prohibit a deficiency judgment. Many borrowers will not be able to hand the keys back to a lender and just walk away. They will remain liable for an amount equal to the difference between the outstanding about of the loan (plus costs) and the higher of either a court determined fair market value of the trust property or the sale price at the trustee’s sale.
Questions and Uncertainty. The new law was aimed at protecting small community banks from losses resulting from unsold speculative new homes. However, the only thing certain with this new law is the great deal of uncertainty that surrounds its unintended consequences. Central to these questions is what it means for the property to be utilized by the trustor. Is this a requirement for owner-occupancy? Is the property being utilized if it is a rental property occupied by tenants? What if the property was purchased for use by a family member? What will be required to prove occupancy? What if the property is in an Arizona jurisdiction, such as Mesa, that does not issue a certificate of occupancy?
Where Do We Go From Here? Representatives from the Governor’s office met with Arizona legislators and real-estate advocates this past week to try and find a workable solution to the issues raised by the new law. Many, including Arizona State Senator Steve Pierce – a sponsor of the bill, have called for its absolute repeal.
Until there is clarity, lending and real estate professionals are in search of answers regarding the consequences of the new law. We help real estate investors and developers understand the issues this new law may bring about, to plan and protect them from deficiency judgments and reach their long term business and personal goals.
If you would like more information about the changes to Arizona’s anti-deficiency laws, please feel free to contact Scott J. Stein at (480) 889-8948 / scott@steinlawplc.com or visit www.steinlawplc.com.
Arizona Society of CPAs
J. Michael Stolp
mhstpt
Robert K Minniti, CPA, CFE, Cr.FA, CFF, MBA
Ed Zollars, CPA
Jason Washo, CPA, PFS
dsscpa
cguerriero
Cindie Hubiak, CPA
Jose Herrera
Heidi Frei
I lend $30,000 dollars to some one and he gave me a deed of trust on a property he already owned free and clear. I found out that he had obtained another loan against this same property and the lender has first position on the property. He had signed a contract in which he promised thst he owned property free and clear and that he would give me first position and not to encumber the property any further. He is in default. What should I do. Can I recover for any deficiency after forclosure? The property has been vacant for a while. According to him he purchased it in a trusteee sale.
[...] is about to change come September 30, 2009 … This is from the Arizona Society of CPAs Blog. Take the time to read it and pass it on. It looks like it won’t affect homeowners that give up a [...]